UK court cuts longest jail terms on activists, rejects 10 appeals

UK court cuts longest jail terms on activists, rejects 10 appeals
Above, protesters outside the Royal Courts of Justice in central London on March 7, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 07 March 2025
Follow

UK court cuts longest jail terms on activists, rejects 10 appeals

UK court cuts longest jail terms on activists, rejects 10 appeals
  • Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion have in recent years carried out spectacular, often disruptive protests
  • Defense lawyers had called the sentences imposed against all 16 activists involved in four separate protests ‘manifestly excessive’

LONDON: A British court on Friday cut some of the heaviest jail terms imposed on climate activists for their high-profile protests, but threw out appeals from 10 others to have their prison sentences overturned.
The groups Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion have in recent years carried out spectacular, often disruptive protests, including stopping London’s busy traffic and targeting famous places and paintings, as part of their campaign to highlight climate change.
But last July, five activists were stunned after being sentenced to between four and five years in prison for planning in an online call to block the M25 motorway around London, a key transport link for the capital.
They were among 16 activists who appealed their jail terms before the Court of Appeal in London in January.
In her ruling on Friday, Lady Chief Justice Sue Carr cut the heaviest jail term of five years imposed on Roger Hallam, 58, a co-founder of Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion, for the conspiracy case to four years.
Two other co-accused in that case had their sentences shortened from four years to three, with two others seeing their four-year terms reduced to 30 months.
One of the oldest activists, Gaie Delap, 78, also saw her sentence shortened from 20 to 18 months, for scaling one of the gantries on the M25.
In the January appeal, defense lawyers had called the sentences imposed against all 16 activists involved in four separate protests “manifestly excessive.”
The group also included two women who threw tomato soup on Vincent van Gogh’s “Sunflowers” painting at London’s National Gallery. Their sentences of 20 months and two years were upheld in Friday’s ruling.
Lawyer Danny Friedman said in January that the collective prison terms of between 15 months to five years were “the highest of their kind in modern British history.”
The activists “did what they did out of sacrifice” and were acting in the “best interests of the public, the planet and future generations,” he said, asking for the jail terms to be reduced or quashed.
But prosecutors argued the sentences had been merited as “all of these applicants went so far beyond what was reasonable.”
Their actions also presented an “extreme danger” to the public and to themselves, they said.
The hearing has been closely watched amid fears that peaceful protest risks being stifled in Britain.
And NGOs and activists have warned the case could have far-reaching implications for future protests.
“Despite some modest reductions, these sentences are still unprecedented and they still have no place in a democracy that upholds the right to protest,” said Greenpeace co-executive director Areeba Hamid.
Friends of the Earth lawyer Katie de Kauwe said in a statement the group was “pleased” that some of the sentences had been reduced.
But she added “ultimately however, we believe that locking up those motivated by their genuine concern for the climate crisis is neither right or makes any sense.”
Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion launched their protests to fight the use of fossil fuels, which scientists say are causing global warming and climate change.
But the groups, which are urging the government to ban fossil fuel use by 2030, have attracted criticism over their eye-catching methods.
Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth had backed what they called “a critically important legal appeal over the right to protest.”
Other cases are still before the courts, including charges brought against two Just Stop Oil members accused of throwing orange paint powder over the stone megaliths of Stonehenge, as well as two activists charged with spray-painting the tomb of naturalist Charles Darwin in Westminster Abbey.
The country’s previous Conservative government took a hostile stance toward disruptive direct action, and passed laws toughening punishments for such offenses.


Philippines says acts in national interest in South China Sea

Philippines says acts in national interest in South China Sea
Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Philippines says acts in national interest in South China Sea

Philippines says acts in national interest in South China Sea
  • The Philippines’ foreign ministry says ‘real issue is China’s refusal to abide by international law’
  • China’s ‘illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive behavior at sea’ have affected Filipino communities
MANILA: China should recognize that the Philippines is an independent and sovereign state whose actions and decisions are driven entirely by national interest and not at the direction of other countries, Manila’s foreign ministry said on Monday.
The Philippines’ foreign ministry also said the “real issue is China’s refusal to abide by international law” and how its “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive behavior at sea” have affected Filipino communities.
“We call on countries to be circumspect and to avoid actions and words that only contribute to tensions in the region,” it said in a statement responding to comments from China that Manila was being directed by external forces.
At a press conference on March 7, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi said the Philippines’ actions in the South China Sea were not independent but part of a “screenplay written by external forces,” to smear China.
The Chinese embassy in Manila did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the foreign ministry’s statement.
The Philippines has embarked on what it calls a transparency initiative to shed light on China’s actions in the South China Sea, including embedding journalists on maritime patrols and resupply missions.
Its approach has resonated with allies, including the United States, who support the 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration that found China’s vast South China Sea claims had no legal basis. China rejects that finding.

Argentina declares national mourning as flood death toll hits 16

Argentina declares national mourning as flood death toll hits 16
Updated 4 min 12 sec ago
Follow

Argentina declares national mourning as flood death toll hits 16

Argentina declares national mourning as flood death toll hits 16
  • Deadly floods struck Friday when a year’s worth of rain fell in a matter of hours in and around Bahia Blanca
  • The flooding had caused $400 million in infrastructure damage
BAHIA BLANCA, Argentina: Argentina announced three days of national mourning late Sunday after authorities raised the death toll from recent flash flooding to 16, with more still missing.
The deadly floods struck Friday when a year’s worth of rain fell in a matter of hours in and around Bahia Blanca, a major port city located in the south of Buenos Aires province, with entire neighborhoods inundated by the fast-rising waters.
The Latin American nation has been particularly shaken by tragic reports of two girls, aged one and five, being swept away in the torrent.
Provincial security minister Javier Alonso confirmed their disappearance Sunday, saying the sisters had climbed onto the roof of a van with their mother to escape the rising waters when a surge ripped them away. Their mother was rescued.
Divers were continuing to search the area, where more than a meter of water remained, Alonso told the Radio Mitre outlet.
Bahia Blanca Mayor Federico Susbielles, meanwhile, told a press conference that the flooding had caused $400 million in infrastructure damage.
Later, in a post on X, he said “there are 16 confirmed deaths, but there are likely to be more” as search efforts continue.
The storm left much of the surrounding coastal area without power. At one point, city officials in Bahia Blanco suspended electricity due to the huge amount of water in the streets.
Argentine President Javier Milei “will declare three days of national mourning” for the deaths, his office said late Sunday, without specifying when the period would begin.
“All areas of the national government will remain dedicated... to assisting the victims in this moment of sorrow for all Argentines,” the presidency said in a statement.
The government has authorized emergency reconstruction aid of 10 billion pesos ($9.2 million at the official exchange rate).
Argentine football superstar Lionel Messi offered his condolences on Instagram to the victims’ families
“Much strength to all those who are having a rough time in this difficult moment,” he wrote.
Environment official Andrea Dufourg said this weekend that the extreme weather event “is a clear example of climate change.”
“Unfortunately this will continue to take place... we have no other option than to prepare cities, educate citizens, establish effective early warning systems,” said Dufourg, who is director of environmental policy for the city of Ituzaingo outside Buenos Aires.
Bahia Blanca has suffered past weather-related disasters, including a storm in December 2023 that claimed 13 lives. It caused houses to collapse and provoked widespread infrastructure damage.

China-US trade war heats up as Beijing’s tariffs take effect

China-US trade war heats up as Beijing’s tariffs take effect
Updated 10 March 2025
Follow

China-US trade war heats up as Beijing’s tariffs take effect

China-US trade war heats up as Beijing’s tariffs take effect
  • After imposing a blanket 10 percent tariff on all Chinese goods in early February, Trump hiked the rate to 20 percent last week
  • China retaliated by imposing levies of 10 and 15 percent on several US farm products, a move designed to hurt Trump’s voter base

BEIJING: China’s tariffs on certain US agricultural goods in retaliation for President Donald Trump’s latest hike on Chinese imports came into force Monday, as trade tensions mount between the world’s two leading economies.
Since retaking office in January, Trump has unleashed a barrage of tariffs on major US trading partners, including China, Canada and Mexico, citing their failure to stop illegal immigration and flows of deadly fentanyl.
After imposing a blanket 10 percent tariff on all Chinese goods in early February, Trump hiked the rate to 20 percent last week.
Beijing reacted quickly, its finance ministry accusing Washington of “undermining” the multilateral trading system and announcing fresh measures of its own.
Those tariffs come into effect Monday and see levies of 10 and 15 percent imposed on several US farm products.
Chicken, wheat, corn and cotton from the United States will now be subject to the higher charge.
Soybeans, sorghum, pork, beef, aquatic products, fruit, vegetables and dairy will face the slightly lower rate.
The tariffs will not apply to goods that left before March 10, however, as long as they arrive in China by April 12.
Analysts say Beijing’s retaliatory tariffs are designed to hurt Trump’s voter base while remaining restrained enough to allow room to hash out a trade deal.
The increasing trade headwinds add to difficulties faced by Chinese leaders currently seeking to stabilize the country’s wavering economy.
Sluggish consumer spending, a prolonged debt crisis in the vast property sector and high youth unemployment are among the issues now facing policymakers.
Analysts say China’s exports — which last year reached record highs — might not provide the same economic lifeline for Beijing as its trade war with Washington intensifies.

Experts say the full effects of the recent wave of tariffs have yet to be fully felt, though early signs already indicate a downturn in shipments.
China’s exports grew 2.3 percent year-on-year during the first two months of 2025, official data showed Friday, missing expectations and slowing significantly from the 10.7 percent growth recorded in December.
“As exports face downside risk with trade war looming, the fiscal policy needs to become more proactive,” wrote Zhiwei Zhang, president and chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management.
The latest trade data came as Chinese officials congregated in Beijing for the country’s largest annual political gathering, known as the “Two Sessions.”
During a speech to delegates on Wednesday, Premier Li Qiang laid out the government’s economic strategy for the year ahead, acknowledging “an increasingly complex and severe external environment.”
Li also announced that the government’s official growth target for the year ahead would be “around five percent” — the same as 2024.
Many economists consider that goal to be ambitious, considering the hurdles facing China’s economy.
“If fiscal spending starts to ramp up again soon then that could more than offset the near-term hit to growth from tariffs,” wrote Julian Evans-Pritchard of Capital Economics.
“However, given the wider headwinds... we still aren’t convinced that fiscal support will be sufficient to deliver anything more than a short-lived boost,” he added.
 


Trump declines to rule out 2025 US recession

Trump declines to rule out 2025 US recession
Updated 10 March 2025
Follow

Trump declines to rule out 2025 US recession

Trump declines to rule out 2025 US recession
  • Recessions are generally defined as two consecutive quarters of weak or negative GDP growth

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump declined Sunday to rule out the possibility that the United States might enter a recession this year.
“I hate to predict things like that,” he told a Fox News interviewer when asked directly about a possible recession in 2025.
“There is a period of transition, because what we’re doing is very big — we’re bringing wealth back to America,” he said, adding, “It takes a little time.”
Trump’s commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, was more definitive when asked Sunday about the possibility of a recession.
“Absolutely not,” he told NBC’s “Meet the Press” when asked whether Americans should brace for a downturn.
Trump’s on-again, off-again tariff threats against Canada, Mexico, China and others have left the US financial markets in turmoil and consumers unsure what the year might bring.
Stock markets just ended their worst week since the November election.
Measures of consumer confidence are down, as shoppers — already battered by years of inflation — brace for the higher prices that tariffs can bring.
And widespread government layoffs being engineered by Trump’s billionaire adviser Elon Musk add further concern.
When asked later Sunday to clarify his remarks on whether there could be a recession, Trump told reports on Air Force One “Who knows?“
Overall, the signs are mixed.
A widely watched Atlanta Federal Reserve index now predicts a 2.4 percent contraction of real GDP growth in the year’s first quarter, which would be the worst result since the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Much of the uncertainty stems from Trump’s shifting tariff policy — effective dates have changed, as have the sectors being targeted — as businesses and investors try to puzzle out what will come next.
Kevin Hassett, Trump’s chief economic adviser, was asked on ABC whether tariffs were primarily temporary or might become permanent.
Hassett said that depended on the behavior of the countries targeted. If they failed to respond positively, he said, the result could be a “new equilibrium” of continuing tariffs.
The administration has insisted that while the economy will pass through a possibly bumpy “transition,” things are headed in a positive direction.
In his State of the Union message on Tuesday, Trump told Americans to expect “a little disturbance” as tariffs take hold, while adding: “We’re okay with that. It won’t be much.”
And his Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned of a “detox period” as the economy cuts government spending.
Given the uncertainties, economists have been wary of making firm predictions.
Economists at Goldman Sachs, citing Trump’s policies, have raised their odds of a recession over the next 12 months from 15 percent to 20 percent.
And Morgan Stanley predicted “softer growth this year” than earlier expected.
Recessions are generally defined as two consecutive quarters of weak or negative GDP growth.
The US was briefly in recession in early 2020 as the Covid pandemic spread. Millions of people lost jobs.


Mark Carney wins vote to replace Trudeau as Canada PM

Mark Carney wins vote to replace Trudeau as Canada PM
Updated 10 March 2025
Follow

Mark Carney wins vote to replace Trudeau as Canada PM

Mark Carney wins vote to replace Trudeau as Canada PM
  • The former banker soundly defeated his main challenger, Trudeau’s former deputy PM Chrystia Freeland
  • Carney calls for unity, warning that the US under Trump was seeking to seize control of Canada

OTTAWA : Canada’s Liberal Party overwhelmingly elected Mark Carney as the country’s next prime minister Sunday, as the former central banker warned of “dark days” brought on by the United States under President Donald Trump.
Carney lost no time taking a defiant stance against a US president he accused of “attacking Canadian workers, families, and businesses.”
“We cannot let him succeed,” added the 59-year-old, who will take over from outgoing Liberal leader, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in the coming days.
Carney may not have the job for long.
Canada must hold elections by October but could well see a snap poll within weeks. Current polls put the opposition Conservatives as slight favorites.
In his victory speech to a boisterous crowd of party supporters in Ottawa, Carney warned the United States under Trump was seeking to seize control of Canada.
“The Americans want our resources, our water, our land, our country,” he said.
“These are dark days, dark days brought on by a country we can no longer trust.”
Carney, who previously led both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, soundly defeated his main challenger, Trudeau’s former deputy prime minister Chrystia Freeland, who held several senior cabinet positions in the Liberal government that was first elected in 2015.
Carney won 85.9 percent of the nearly 152,000 votes cast. Freeland took just eight percent of the vote.
Carney campaigned on a promise to stand up to Trump.
The US president has repeatedly spoken about annexing Canada and thrown bilateral trade, the lifeblood of the Canadian economy, into chaos with dizzying tariff actions that have veered in various directions since he took office.
Delivering a farewell address before the results were announced, Trudeau said “Canadians face from our neighbor an existential challenge.”

‘Seasoned economic crisis manager’
Celebrating the outcome in Ottawa, party loyalist Cory Stevenson said “the Liberal party has the wind in its sails.”
“We chose the person who could best face off against (Tory leader) Pierre Poilievre in the next election and deal with Donald Trump,” he told AFP.
Carney has argued that his experience makes him the ideal counter to the US president, portraying himself as a seasoned economic crisis manager who led the Bank of Canada through the 2008-2009 financial crisis and the Bank of England through the turbulence that followed the 2016 Brexit vote.
Data released from the Angus Reid polling firm on Wednesday shows Canadians see Carney as the favorite choice to face off against Trump, potentially offering the Liberals a boost over the opposition Conservatives.
Forty-three percent of respondents said they trusted Carney the most to deal with Trump, with 34 percent backing Poilievre.
Before Trudeau announced his plans to resign in January, the Liberals were headed for an electoral wipeout, but the leadership change and Trump’s influence have dramatically tightened the race.
“I think we were written off about four months ago, and now we’re right back where we should be,” former MP Frank Baylis, who also ran for the leadership, told AFP in Ottawa.

Carney made a fortune as an investment banker at Goldman Sachs before entering the Canadian civil service.
Since leaving the Bank of England in 2020, he has served as a United Nations envoy working to get the private sector to invest in climate-friendly technology and has held private sector roles.
He has never served in parliament nor held an elected public office.
Analysts say his untested campaign skills could prove a liability against a Conservative Party already running attack ads accusing Carney of shifting positions and misrepresenting his experience.
“It is absolutely a risk. He is unproven in the crucible of an election,” said Cameron Anderson, a political scientist at Ontario’s Western University.
He said Carney’s victory speech, and its tough anti-Trump rhetoric, “is what Canadians want to hear from their leaders.”
“The average Canadian in the country is viewing these things in an existential way,” Anderson said.